Start Searching the Answers
The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.
The Question & Answer (Q&A) Knowledge Managenet
The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.
MeSH terms are official words or phrases selected to represent particular biomedical concepts. When labelling an article, indexers select terms only from the official MeSH list – never other spellings or variations.
To search within MeSH:
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) is the National Library of Medicine’s controlled vocabulary thesaurus, used for indexing articles for the MEDLINE®/PubMED® database. Each article citation is associated with a set of MeSH terms that describe the content of the citation.
MeSH is the “controlled vocabulary” used by the National Library of Medicine – basically a set list of terms used to categorize and index articles. Using MeSH terms to find articles in PubMed will expand your search skills and connect you to articles you may not have normally found.
To use CINAHL/MeSH subject headings:
Eight key stages were determined relating specifically to literature searching in systematic reviews. They were: who should literature search, aims and purpose of literature searching, preparation, the search strategy, searching databases, supplementary searching, managing references and reporting the search process.
These are the steps required when developing a comprehensive search strategy for a systematic review:
How to search effectively
PRISMA is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. PRISMA focuses on the reporting of reviews evaluating randomized trials, but can also be used as a basis for reporting systematic reviews of other types of research, particularly evaluations of interventions.
What is PRISMA? PRISMA stands for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. It is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The PRISMA statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a 4-phase flow diagram.
The PRISMA checklist
The PRISMA Flow Diagram The flow diagram depicts the flow of information through the different phases of a Systematic Review. It maps out the number of records identified, included and excluded, and the reasons for exclusions.
It is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The aim of the PRISMA Statement is to help authors improve the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. PRISMA can also be used as a basis for reporting literature reviews for other types of research.
How to make a Flowchart in Word
Steps for writing a systematic review
Identifying keywords There are many ways to locate these terms, including background reading, dictionaries, regular and database thesauri or subject headings and text mining tools. The process of searching will also help identify more terms.
Furthermore, despite the increasing guidelines for effectively conducting a systematic review, we found that basic steps often start from framing question, then identifying relevant work which consists of criteria development and search for articles, appraise the quality of included studies, summarize the evidence, and …
A systematic review article follows the same structure as that of an original research article. It typically includes a title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references.
Levels of Evidence
Level of evidence (LOE) | Description |
---|---|
Level IV | Evidence from well-designed case-control or cohort studies. |
Level V | Evidence from systematic reviews of descriptive and qualitative studies (meta-synthesis). |
Level VI | Evidence from a single descriptive or qualitative study. |
It involves planning a well thought out search strategy which has a specific focus or answers a defined question. The review identifies the type of information searched, critiqued and reported within known timeframes.
The key characteristics of a systematic review are: a clearly stated set of objectives with pre-defined eligibility criteria for the studies; an explicit, reproducible methodology; a systematic search that attempts to identify all the studies that would meet the eligibility criteria; an assessment of the validity of …